AccueilAccueil  CalendrierCalendrier  FAQFAQ  RechercherRechercher  MembresMembres  GroupesGroupes  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  ConnexionConnexion  

Résultats par :
Rechercher Recherche avancée
Derniers sujets
Hier à 19:52 par PEUTÊTRE

» la DOMINATION MASCULINE en FRANCE : machisme, travail, domesticité, violences...
Hier à 18:59 par PEUTÊTRE

Hier à 17:12 par Patlotch

Hier à 16:28 par Patlotch

Hier à 14:58 par Patlotch

» ÉMEUTES, typologie formes/contenus : des réalités à l'idéologie
Hier à 13:16 par PEUTÊTRE

» PAUVRETÉS et RICHESSES : produit de l'exploitation et des dominations capitalistes
Lun 24 Sep - 20:31 par PEUTÊTRE

Lun 24 Sep - 12:46 par Patlotch

» PERMACULTURE : MODE ou 'RÉVOLUTION' ? Expériences et réflexions
Dim 23 Sep - 15:13 par Patlotch

» L'EMPIRE EXTRACTIVISTE. Vols, dette, malnutrition, accaparement de terres et ressources...
Dim 23 Sep - 13:26 par PEUTÊTRE

Dim 23 Sep - 9:38 par Patlotch

» 9. l'apparition plurielle d'une nouvelle théorie communiste ? questions parentes
Sam 22 Sep - 18:41 par Patlotch

» PENSÉES diverses à marier sans modération
Sam 22 Sep - 17:31 par PEUTÊTRE

» 0. un livre ? Une théorie est apparue... Diffusion, réception... débats ?
Sam 22 Sep - 14:44 par Patlotch

» LA LOGIQUE COLONIALE, histoire et actualité, du COLONIALISME aux COLONIALITÉS sans oublier le CAPITAL
Sam 22 Sep - 13:44 par Patlotch

Sam 22 Sep - 13:42 par Patlotch

» MACRONISME, ÉTAT français et RESTRUCTURATION de la géoéconomie du CAPITAL
Sam 22 Sep - 12:32 par PEUTÊTRE

» sur l'OCCIDENT, son histoire, son concept, et sa CRISE dans celle du capitalisme
Sam 22 Sep - 12:14 par PEUTÊTRE

Mer 19 Sep - 18:54 par PEUTÊTRE

» actualités des LUTTES et de la PENSÉE DÉCOLONIALE
Lun 17 Sep - 19:37 par PEUTÊTRE

Partagez | 

 RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale

Aller en bas 

Messages : 6337
Date d'inscription : 29/04/2015
Localisation : trop loin

MessageSujet: RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale    Dim 29 Nov - 23:40

sujet détruit, à reconstruire...
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

Messages : 6337
Date d'inscription : 29/04/2015
Localisation : trop loin

MessageSujet: Re: RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale    Jeu 3 Déc - 23:31

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

Messages : 6337
Date d'inscription : 29/04/2015
Localisation : trop loin

MessageSujet: Re: RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale    Mar 19 Jan - 12:36

Raymond Williams discussion panel
Politics and Letters

Geoff Dyer leads a discussion with Nikil Saval & Jenny Davidson on British author Raymond Williams.

Celebrated writer Geoff Dyer is known as a leading voice in contemporary British literature, and has the accolades to prove it. Join Geoff and Strand in an exclusive, in-depth panel discussion surrounding society's impact on literature, through Raymond Williams' interviews in Politics and Letters. A new edition of the now classic Raymond Williams set of interviews still serves as a vast contribution to the intellectual culture of the left and includes an updated introduction written by Geoff.

Joining the discussion is n+1's Nikil Saval, whose Cubed: A Secret History of the Workplace was published last year; as well as novelist Jenny Davidson, who teaches English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University.

Buy a copy of Politics and Letters: Interviews with New Left Review here:

Citation :
Raymond Williams made a central contribution to the intellectual culture of the Left in the English-speaking world. He was also one of the key figures in the foundation of cultural studies in Britain, which turned critical skills honed on textual analysis to the examination of structures and forms of resistance apparent in everyday life.

Politics and Letters is a volume of interviews with Williams, conducted by New Left Review, designed to bring into clear focus the major theoretical and political issues posed by his work.

Introduced by writer Geoff Dyer, Politics and Letters ranges across Williams’s biographical development, the evolution of his cultural theory and literary criticism, his work on dramatic forms and his fiction, and an exploration of British and international politics.

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

Messages : 6337
Date d'inscription : 29/04/2015
Localisation : trop loin

MessageSujet: Re: RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale    Sam 24 Sep - 23:44

à propos du livre ci-dessus

Raymond Williams, Politics and Letters: Interviews with New Left Review

Reviewed by Derek Wall 3 May 2016

Derek Wall is International Co-ordinator of the Green Party of England and Wales. He is an associated tutor in Politics, Goldsmiths College, London. His books include The Sustainable Economics of Elinor Ostrom (Routledge) and The Commons in History (MIT). He is a columnist for the Morning Star newspaper and is writing a book on post-capitalist economics.

Citation :
Raymond Williams (1921-1988) was a self-described ‘Welsh European’, whose academic work as a literary theorist and activism, as variously a member of the Communist Party, Labour Party and Plaid Cymru, shaped the post-World War II British left. This recently reissued book provides a survey of Raymond Williams’ life and works. It is a novel and exciting project. Raymond Williams was interviewed about each of his most important books as well as his early biography and political essays. His opinions are subjected to detailed critique with a special attention from the interviewers on contradictions and silences in his work. This makes fascinating but often somewhat brutal reading.

Both the form and the content of this collection of interviews with the New Left Review (NLR) mark this as an important volume. Williams saw the book as a new and disturbing piece of literature. Three members of the NLR editorial board subjected Williams’ work to detailed scrutiny. Many of his major books and significant essays are examined. Such analysis was perhaps especially rigorous because the NLR editors knew his work in some detail, and believed his contributions were essential to the construction of Marxism in a UK context. It is common to subject thinkers we disagree with to criticism, how much more painful but instructive to examine those with whom we sympathize with sharp analytical tools. Williams seems to have been plunged into personal crisis by taking part in the volume which, running to over 400 pages, took several months of interviews to complete. While this form may have been difficult for Williams, at times, it is an excellent overview of his work up until 1980 and provides a model for critical materialist scholarship. It would be good to see this form extend to other thinkers; it produces impressive results.

The contents, as well as the form, have considerable merit. A major intellectual figure from the 1950s to his death in 1988, Williams often seems forgotten, and even at his height of popularity seems to have been largely unnoticed outside the UK. There are a number of reasons why his considerable output remains important nearly thirty years after his death. First, he challenged the Marxism that he encountered in the 1940s, as naïve, and embarked on a quest to make Marxist ideas both more sophisticated and accessible. While Britain is seen as distant from varied forms of Western Marxism some of the questions examined by thinkers as varied as Sartre, Althusser, Gramsci and the Frankfurt School were also addressed by Williams. Equally, his experience as a working class socialist who gained access to an elite academic institution are instructive. He can be seen as a key thinker in the development of ecosocialism. His essay ‘Ecology and Socialism’ helped inspire socialists to embrace an ecological dimension in their politics and for greens to look to a socialist commitment in their environmental analysis.

The early chapters of the book, which are biographical, are perhaps the least challenging but most enjoyable. Raymond Williams discusses how he was born the son of a railway signalman in the Welsh border town of Pandy in Monmouth. He shone at grammar school. Without his knowledge, his headmaster and father successfully applied for him to read English at Cambridge. His father was an active member of the Labour Party and memories of the 1926 General Strike were strong in Williams’ community as he grew up. His left wing commitment deepened at Cambridge and he joined the Communist Party. He wrote Communist Party pamphlets with Eric Hobsbawm but drifted out of the party. During the Second World War he joined an anti-tank unit and fought in Normandy. His intellectual trajectory saw him developing theoretical insights from the literary critic F.R. Leavis and as well as Marx and Engels.

The early chapters provide some of Williams most charming and vibrant prose but the remainder of the book is more instructive and, for Williams, often challenging. Williams was, for much of the post war period, Britain's key left wing intellectual. He sold hundreds of thousands of books, which given their theoretical nature is impressive, and he appeared in numerous BBC television programmes. His contention that 'culture is ordinary' was used to challenge elitist notions of culture, specifically T.S. Eliot’s notion that a kind of secular priesthood was needed to protect and promote culture. Williams engaged with Western Marxist approaches to literature and language, helping to introduce thinkers such as Gramsci, Althusser and Lucien Goldman to British audiences. His work helped promote the creation of a Marxist influenced form of cultural studies in the UK.

Raymond Williams is most important as a thinker who intervened and challenged both elite literary theory and the often simplistic and deterministic form of Marxism that dominated in the 1940s and 1950s. The suggestion in Politics and Letters is that, despite this, he was not always a rigorous and consistent theorist. His first major work Culture and Society, published in 1958, is treated to extensive discussion in Politics and Letters. As far as I can tell Culture and Society argues that culture, rather than being ‘organic’ and fixed, is a product of social change. Williams describes the output of a number of key English commentators on culture from around 18th century onwards with an emphasis on the influence of the industrial revolution. Williams moves from Burke via William Blake to Carlyle and Arnold on to the interesting Marxist literary theorist Christopher Caudwell. The barrage begins. Williams’ interviewers argued that he provides too little criticism of right wing thinkers under examination such as Edmund Burke, who was motivated by antipathy to the French Revolution. They also hint that Williams is too Anglocentric in the book, even failing to discuss the contribution of Marx and Engels who, of course, lived in exile in Britain during the period under study. The interviews continue with Williams defending his political engagement during the writing of the book and agreeing with some of the critical points made by the NLR editors. He notes defensively but rather pleasingly that: ‘You have to remember that I read my own books too, and that in a competition for critical readers. I shall at least be in the final list.’ (106). This dialogue is reflected through much of the remainder of Politics and Letters.

Williams often seems better on intervention than sustained analysis. I personally feel this is a strength. For example, despite the supposed weaknesses of Culture and Society, it was a largely successful intervention that challenged the notion of an elite culture. From his early employment with the Workers Education Association to his broadcasts with the BBC, Williams promoted an approach to culture that sought to build diversity and democracy. I also feel that, while there is a small Raymond Williams industry, his approach can be seen as a contribution to a wider network of scholarship. On the left when we speak of a particular thinker, say Marx or Brecht, we import a form of methodological individualism; intellectual production is a collective endeavour with key thinkers acting perhaps as nodes rather than unique originators. Perhaps one of Williams’ most important contributions to challenging this notion of an individual intellectual was his book Keywords where he introduces a method that promotes a collective endeavour to research and understand, moving us beyond an author alone.

In Keywords Williams showed that words, rather than having an essential meaning, are subject to often dramatic change. One is reminded of the Russian theorist Bakhtin’s notion that the class struggle extends to the interpretation of individual words and that meaning is dialogic and polysemic. The interviewers in Politics and Letters, of course, take a sharp line, looking at contradictions and silences in Keywords. However, they acknowledge Keywords as a vital contribution, noting:

The intellectual effect of the kind of work initiated by Keywords could be regarded as akin to that of the Marxist critique of political economy – the demonstration that ideas and categories which are deemed universal and timeless are in fact eminently changeable and timebound. […] Your strategy in Keywords is to register the changes of meaning across a whole vocabulary very pointedly indeed… (177).

Keywords was originally planned as part of Culture and Society but the publishers felt it was too long. Since Williams’ death in 1988, keyword analysis has continued. In 2016 for example, with the Keywords Project (

Amongst Williams’ numerous works, The City and the Country is a key text for those of us on the ecosocialist left. In it, Williams develops his ideas about nature and culture, making way for his green political orientation in his essay `Ecology and Socialism’. The City and the Country shows that ideas of nature and environment often fail to reflect the social construction of ecological concepts and issues.

The last section of the book deals with Williams’ political essays. These could be seen as marking a successful hegemonic project, a new left thinking that has become, at least in the UK, a left common sense, to some extent. Williams dominates political discourse on the left even though his name may be forgotten. The socialist and feminist leader of Plaid Cymru Leanne Wood quotes Williams. The current leader of the Green Party of England and Wales gave an annual Raymond Williams Foundation lecture in 2015. The Communist Party of Britain seems closer to Raymond Williams’ approach, like formulations that link culture to class politics. I have no idea if the new and most left-wing leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, reads Williams, but he often sounds as if he does.

Williams seems to reject both a mechanistic Marxist politics that rejects culture, and culturalist politics that forgets class and economics. While the English Marxist historian E.P.Thompson critiqued Williams’ work as being too culturalist, Williams, towards the end of his life, defined himself once again as a Marxist. Williams also puts emphasis on a democratic and participatory form of left politics. Williams was, as noted, a keen early advocate of an ecological dimension to socialism.

During the 1980s the Communist Party of Great Britain was torn apart by a conflict between Eurocommunists and more traditional members, with the Party eventually dissolving in 1991. Supporters of the Morning Star newspaper then relaunched the present Communist Party of Britain. The Communist Party has had a strong intellectual influence on the wider UK left. Williams was not a participant in the conflict within the CPGB in the 1980s, having left the Party during the Second World War, however his work provides an insight into the conflict. Like the Eurocommunists, Raymond Williams stressed the need to engage with culture and new social movements, however he was keen that such engagements did not replace working class solidarity and activism. In summary, to my mind, and as is shown by this pioneering book, his thinking was neither consistently rigorous or original, but he helped challenge both a particular form of rigid Marxism and an elitist approach to culture. In doing so he opened up ideological space for the British left in 2016, which in its diversity notes both class politics and ecology as well as the importance of structural change in ownership and debates around identity and intersectionality. Was Raymond Williams the Welsh Althusser? Not really, but he contributed to some vital changes in the left political landscape in Wales and England, and we can still gain from close study of his words.

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur
Contenu sponsorisé

MessageSujet: Re: RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale    

Revenir en haut Aller en bas
RAYMOND WILLIAMS : une longue révolution... un lien théorique essentiel entre critique marxiste de la société et critique décoloniale
Revenir en haut 
Page 1 sur 1
 Sujets similaires
» Le reportage polémique de ce début d'année 2016
» Quel lien existe t-il entre une impossibilité d'ouvrir mon logiciel Heredis avec un changement d'adresse IP
» Les OGM, une seconde Révolution Verte. Sera-t-elle aussi meurtrière ?
» Faire un lien court
» Documentaire: Darwin (R)évolution.

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
PATLOTCH / COMMUNISME et CIVILISATIONS :: ANNEXES :: Sujets annexes ou archivés-
Sauter vers: